Meta post #1: Why I created

What led me to create

As a child I would wonder about such questions as, “why do Shell operate more petrol stations than BP?” and “Why are McDonald’s more successful than Burger King?”

I assumed these were questions that naturally everyone would be asking, but it turned out it was rather a niche interest. Yes, dear reader, I was interested in brands and companies.

Nobody I knew could really answer these questions, and this was the days before widespread internet access! I could turn to books, but my questions were really ones best answered in academic studies. The number of British universities with substantial business history departments (and correspondingly well-stocked libraries of business history) is surprisingly few.


Academic journals and books online would help massively in later years, but until then I instead turned to regular history, which was of course much easier to get my hands on.

Someone recommended that I read Niall Ferguson’s Empire (2003), a history of the British Empire. How did a small island nation off the North West of the European continent come to rule over a quarter of the global population? Ferguson helped to answer that question, but he also demonstrated that not only was approaching history from an economic perspective well worth doing, but that it could be engaging and readable too.


I was encouraged by the example set by public intellectuals such as Adam Curtis and Malcolm Gladwell, individuals who sated that hunger for knowledge about the world, whilst in doing so fostered a sense of fun, discovery and playfulness. Curtis chronicled advertising and brand management in The Century of the Self (2002), and Gladwell’s 2004 essay, ‘The Ketchup Conundrum‘, explored how Heinz developed the leading tomato ketchup in the world. Curtis and Gladwell demonstrated that such stereotypically dry subject matter could engage people. They were also unafraid to challenge the “established consensus” on various matters.


When access to the internet became an option, I was able to satisfy my curiosity about business history.

Official company websites often lacked a history section, or if they did it lacked depth, or it was outrageously biased, or it was demonstrably incorrect. Wikipedia and Grace’s Guides were two helpful references, but they had glaring gaps in their coverage, and often hosted inaccuracies.

A found a beacon of historical veracity through the blogs of Martyn Cornell and Ron Pattinson. With a focus on the history of brewing, Cornell and Pattinson are brilliant at returning to the primary sources, and in doing so demonstrate that many published historical claims are inaccurate. I was initially amazed at how much “established consensus” they were able to refute with relative ease.

I worked as an editor on Wikipedia, but eventually grew frustrated by the lack of control over my own work. Thus, I decided to create a blog of my own. Beer and brewing seemed to me to be a subject that already enjoyed quite strong coverage, so I instead gravitated towards a focus on food and drink. I have subsequently broadened my reach to include articles on all sorts of companies, although consumer goods remains the main remit.

Liked it? Take a second to support Thomas Farrell on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *